To Live Earth from Chernobyl with IPCC

This blogg was opened 7/7 2007 during the Live Earth TV campaign, which intends to educate people in reducing carbon dioxide emissions to prevent climate change.

Such mass-'education' will reinforce people's unawareness of the need of adaptation to inevitable climate change. Thereby many lives are threatened in our and next generations, particularly in developing countries

Even worse is that it may increase emissions of really poisonous substances.
A small but apparent example is the mercury in energy saving lightbulbs.

The greatest hazard to life on Earth induced by current climate politics, though, is the forthcoming production and spread of radioactive material from nuclear power industry, now recovering from the Chernobyl disaster in 1986.

Human CO2 emissions are blamed in political campaigns with enormous financial transfers in the energy sector and human activities such as in Live Earth. They take time, money and mental resources from individual citizens - to reinforce influence and power for governments in industrialised countries.
Most of these down-top transfers are based on research selected by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, established in 1988.

Now, top-politicians become popular even for their collection of resources from individual energy consumers. By blaming escape-goats for extensive CO2 emissions wealthy people and politicians such as Al Gore, increase their popularity in a similar way as did the medieval Inquisition. Though the punishment is much less severe, the mobbing process is the same.

Note the short time interval between the radioactive rainfalls from the Chernobyl nuclear plant (1986) and the formal establishment of IPCC (1988).
Does anybody know facts confirming that IPCC was created as a result from post-Chernobyl lobbying by the nuclear power and weapon industry?

Now, IPCC reports have raised media attention and public concern of Global Warming. (After the 1970's energy crisis, observations of Cooling 1940-1970 were used to promote nuclear power.)
In more detail, the IPCC selective support has contributed

• common belief that CO2 changes cause temperature changes
• great financial transfers in the energy sector,
• substantial changes of societal resource allocation,
• increased governmental influence,
• a tremendous public interest in climate issues and
• better reputation for nuclear power industry - indicating its near rehabilitation.

Few of these effects would have been a reality today, if media and public were aware of that non-IPCC scientists have found that the most decisive processes take place in space, out of control for mankind:
Climate change may be determined by space phenomena, rather than by anthropogenic carbon emissions. In an interview published 06.25.2007 by Discover Magazine, a research director explains that ... "in the standard view of climate change, you think of clouds as a result of the climate that you have. Our idea reverses that, turns things completely upside down, saying that the climate is a result of how the clouds are."

However, such evidence has been ignored by the intergovernmental climate panel, and even denied by people taking advantage of current climate politics. Responsible people in the IPCC may excuse themselves by referring to their instruction stating that "human-induced climate change" only is to be considered by IPCC supported research.

Comments are welcome revealing this cover-up process and linking to facts or statements from scientists ignored by the IPCC.